Aesthetic flourishing: Scientists’ experiences of beauty, wonder, and awe as indicators of higher wellbeing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v14i3.3015Abstract
The majority of existing empirical literature examining both the mental and physical health of academic scientists has focused almost exclusively on the negative outcomes of adverse working conditions and occupational stressors, especially burnout and attrition. Comparatively less attention has been given to potentially protective aspects of wellbeing. This disparity is possibly due to the fact that ‘wellbeing’ itself is less clearly defined. The wellbeing conceptual space has typically been divided into areas of hedonia and eudaimonia, but there have been recent interdisciplinary calls for consideration of higher or ‘self-transcendent’ aspects of wellbeing, which draw on primarily positive psychology and industrial/organizational sociology but also philosophy, theology, and the arts (Belzak et al., 2017; Huta & Ryan, 2010; Thrash, 2021; Varga, 2021). In contrast to hedonic and eudaimonic aspects, self-transcendent wellbeing seems to be related to higher goods (e.g., unity, truth, goodness, and beauty), as well as higher states (e.g., inspiration, insight, and awe), that indicate a form of flourishing beyond simple happiness or even self-actualization (Maslow, 1971; Thrash, 2021; Varga, 2021). In an effort to empirically differentiate these aspects of wellbeing, the present study measured and compared particular constructs—needs satisfaction, meaningfulness, aesthetic experiences—respectively prototypical of hedonic, eudaimonic, and self-transcendent wellbeing in a sample of biologists and physicists. We find that when controlling for both hedonic (basic needs satisfaction) and eudaimonic (vocational identity) wellbeing indicators, frequency of aesthetic experience (indicating self-transcendent wellbeing) still had a significant unique effect positively predicting human flourishing, with an effect size of greater magnitude than that of the eudaimonic predictor. These results suggest an empirically differentiable underexplored higher aspect of wellbeing above and beyond traditional markers of hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter J. Varga, Chelsea Rae Kelly, Christopher J. Jacobi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


International Journal of Wellbeing | ISSN 1179-8602