Flourishing in South Africa: Benchmarks and sociodemographic variation across 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors in the Global Flourishing Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v15i3.5237Abstract
Using nationally representative data for South Africa (N = 2,651) from Wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study, we explored the distributions of 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors and tested for potential sociodemographic differences in the means/proportions of those indicators. When comparing estimates for South Africa with pooled estimates for the combined set of 22 countries included in the Global Flourishing Study, we did not find definitive evidence of differences on most of the main health and wellbeing outcomes. On the few main outcomes where we observed differences, estimates for some were more favorable in South Africa (e.g., peace, suffering) while others were less favorable (e.g., life satisfaction, trust). South Africa was more distinguishable from the entire set of 22 countries on the outcomes within the supplementary domains of socioeconomic factors and religion/spirituality, with lower estimates found for South Africa on several socioeconomic factors and higher estimates observed for almost all religion/spirituality indicators. Our exploration of sociodemographic variation in the outcomes suggested that some subpopulations might be flourishing to a greater degree than others (e.g., those aged 80 years or older, males), but the pattern of sociodemographic differences across the outcomes was somewhat mixed and the flourishing profile of subpopulations varied quite considerably. These findings offer important insights for South African policymakers and public health practitioners on the need to support vulnerable subpopulations (e.g., females, those who are divorced), as well as lay the foundation for population-level monitoring of flourishing in South Africa using future Global Flourishing Study panel data.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Richard G. Cowden, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Kaymarlin Govender, Hans J. Hendriks, Willem J. Schoeman, Brendan Case, Ying Chen, Tim Lomas, R. Noah Padgett, Byron R. Johnson, Tyler J. VanderWeele

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


International Journal of Wellbeing | ISSN 1179-8602