The design and analysis architecture of the Global Flourishing Study: Advancing knowledge through coordinated research reports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v15i3.6700Abstract
In this paper, we describe the design, analysis, and planning of the Global Flourishing Study (GFS) and its accompanying research papers. We discuss various influences on the planning and design of the study, including multi-purpose epidemiologic cohort studies, outcome-wide analysis templates, and multidimensional notions of flourishing. We provide an overview of the coordinated analytic strategies of several series of GFS research papers, the common methodologic approaches and shared methods review of these series of research reports, and their relations to the accompanying special collections in the Springer Nature journals and in the International Journal of Wellbeing that hosted many of these papers and publications. We respond to some recent critiques (Blanchflower, 2026) of the analytic and publication approaches that the core GFS research team has employed, and we discuss some of the limitations of, and future directions for, the GFS and the research that has emerged from it.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tyler J. VanderWeele, Byron R. Johnson, Matt Bradshaw, Brendan W. Case, Ying Chen, Richard G. Cowden, Chris Felton, Tim Lomas, R. Noah Padgett

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


International Journal of Wellbeing | ISSN 1179-8602